Without getting into the debate of interpreting the Creation story literally versus as an analogy, I wonder if the story had to happen the way it did. That both humans, Adam and Eve, had to sin. That if one did, then automatically the other one had to too. Essentially, it wouldn't matter who sinned "first" because order doesn't matter when everyone is going to do the same thing.
The continuing story would not have worked if both of them didn't "sin". Both of them had to be cast out of the Garden. Both had to be cast out into the 'real world' so they could procreate and make more humans. If one of them had stayed in the Garden, human civilization would have looked very different these days.
I'm not trying to say it was Eve's destiny to eat the fruit and Adam's destiny to accept her offer. However, I do think that neither human would have been able to make it through the temptation of not eating the fruit, Eve was just the first one to go. I think the snake could have easily convinced Adam before Eve that nothing bad would have happen from eating the fruit, and thus Adam would have been received more of the blame for causing the down fall of Man.
Eve's taken her share of the blame throughout history, but I think placing more "blame" on her is the wrong response to this story.
No comments:
Post a Comment